Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Teabagger

Good thing this guy's dead, because he would definitely not be with the program today.

7 comments:

smitty1e said...

Yeah, but if you're historical, you don't matter.
Note the emphasis on the present tense in Progressivism.

Paco said...

W-e-l-l, that all depends...

smitty1e said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
smitty1e said...

Important point: does Progressivism support a critical analysis of FDR, which may admit him a buffoon,
or does it offer a two dimensional icon for public veneration? See: JFK.

Paco said...

The victors write not only the history, but the historiography. I think Progressives are as eager as anybody else to find historical models for their actions, but not in any genuinely objective, analytical sense. That's why their history is largely propaganda and their historiography a con game.

bruce said...

If someone like Tom Hanks believes the Pacific War was largely a product of western racism - then we have a problem alright.

RebeccaH said...

Bruce is right.

Historical references are fine, but they need to be made relevant to the generations of today. The Tom Hanks sellouts must be refuted in any way possible.